Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 17:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 642
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 47
Reflection 54.2
Parallax 44.1
38% 48.4 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 47
Splatting 61.3
48% 58.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 427 430 400 239 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 415
Mixed 422
SusWrite 351
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 40.9
163% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 343
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKKW25 187GB
174GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 177 178 181 178 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,240
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 219
254% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 75.9
255% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 328
300% 475 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 207%
Great: 191%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 93 93 93 95 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback