Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 00:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 258
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 994
88% 748 Pts
64-Core 2,577
160% 2,577 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 214
Parallax 221
131% 199 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 197
Splatting 137
149% 189 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 130%
Great: 174%
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1376 909 514 512 480 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1914
Write 1,401
Mixed 839
SusWrite 865
279% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 54.8
198% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 444
392% 605 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 221%
Great: 283%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
813GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 45 45 43 43 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 124
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 45.2
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB
276GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 34 36 31 37 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60% Good
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 104
SusWrite 36.6
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
666GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 44 51 39 41 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 108
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 45.9
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 67.2
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 65.6
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 160%
This bench: 165%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback