Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 00:24
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,014
90% 764 Pts
64-Core 2,544
158% 2,544 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 215
Parallax 226
134% 202 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 200
Splatting 135
150% 190 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 131%
Great: 174%
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.02 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 625 623 574 547 531 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2007
Write 948
Mixed 741
SusWrite 596
236% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 56.9
208% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 1024
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 464
398% 606 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 211%
Great: 283%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
813GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 41 50 41 50 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 51
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 46.8
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB
276GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 42 41 39 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 160
Write 164
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 39.7
70% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
666GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 40 49 44 39 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 34
Write 116
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 45.2
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
166% Outstanding
MC Read 67.5
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 64.8
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 160%
This bench: 166%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,044
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback