Asus M4A785TD-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A785TD-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 113
53% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0421) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 17
Parallax 22.8
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 19
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 128 57 18 353 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 68 76 85 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 75.6
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 84 91 94 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback