bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1598 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 03:44
Run Duration802 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E-2146G
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 238
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 414
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 256MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.1.24
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 22.8
1% 8.96 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 31.5
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 275GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 348 330 372 394 393 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 79%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 275GB
222GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 842 842 842 843 838 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 79%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 17GB
31GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 164 173 182 179 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 34GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,426
Write 1,304
Mixed 1,363
305% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 47.8
156% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 55.2
45% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 53%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,305
Write 1,136
Mixed 1,377
284% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 49.4
161% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 57.3
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 52.3
42% 57.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 27.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback