Dell OptiPlex 790

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 790
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 790  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 04:26
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 276
42% 302 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 2400 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 79.4
81% 89.4 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 76.3
65% 79.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 117 146 146 149 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 145
Write 157
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 139
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
299GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 110 103 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 86
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 107
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
117GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 53
Write 58
Mixed 49
SusWrite 66.3
78% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 49%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
688GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 84.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 87.2
109% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
2TB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46% Average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 109
132% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46%
Great: 44%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
14GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 11.1
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. M378B5773CH0-CH9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 790 Builds (Compare 5,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 790

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback