HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EB
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 03:11
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 229
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 84 85 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 127
Write 113
Mixed 130
SusWrite 89
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 29.6
125% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 109
85% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
466GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 80 81 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 78.3
Write 74.2
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 79
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD2 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback