Fujitsu CELSIUS H760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H760  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB29A
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 562
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 1939) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6290
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 15
Parallax 7.22
6% 9.73 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 14.1
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
Fujitsu(10CF 194D) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 15
Parallax 15.6
14% 15.9 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 122 127 122 120 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 440
Write 383
Mixed 293
SusWrite 126
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 40.4
134% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 236
197% 286 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$41
765GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 100 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 100
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H760 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback