To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 22:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 206
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 666
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
XFX(1682 2372) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 8.63
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 2.84
7% 6.65 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 5.61
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm981 NVMe Samsung 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD71D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 302 303 304 305 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 1,253
Mixed 993
SusWrite 450
234% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 47.8
168% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 658
476% 619 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 166%
Great: 255%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: K2AOAB5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 55.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 56.4
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDVS64GB 64GB
11GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 99 99 99 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 249
Write 97.5
Mixed 105
SusWrite 93.1
160% 136 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Seri Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 1600 CL9 Seri 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback