Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 88.6 39% 63 Pts	4-Core 73.2 8-Core 83.6 10% 78.4 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 1162) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.78 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 4.91 3% 4.38 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 7 5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 245GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 145 151 161 161 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 79 Write 84.3 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 151 22% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 8.7 33% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 9.2 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 11.5 9% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.2 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16