HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.2 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 10:10
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 133
61% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 539
50% 414 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 4.09
0% 4.19 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 5.96
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS156030VLS600 300GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 152 157 144 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 171
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 154
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.4
273% 2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 2.7
10% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback