Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 06:01
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 154
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 608
53% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 124
Parallax 126
104% 126 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 126
Splatting 102
107% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 2120 1153 1156 1158 1159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,324
Write 2,127
Mixed 1,417
SusWrite 1,504
413% 1,843 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.1
229% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 528
391% 518 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 279%
Great: 381%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190
228GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 279 265 287 200 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 424
Write 307
Mixed 175
SusWrite 267
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 27
105% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 150
149% 236 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 103%
Mercury Electra 6G SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 103 265 251 278 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 322
Write 108
Mixed 292
SusWrite 221
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 22.4
79% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 55.5
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 34.9
24% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52%
Great: 60%
Fusion-io ioScale 1.30TB
474GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 303 302 302 307 306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.8% Excellent
Read 336
Write 300
Mixed 305
SusWrite 304
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 39.2
138% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 240
200% 291 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WRSN 500GB
337GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 313 301 282 280 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 443
Mixed 348
SusWrite 310
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 40
140% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 252
208% 300 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 132 135 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 134
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 134
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD F4-2133C15-8GVR 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
120% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 45.7
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback