Intel MAHOBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel MAHOBAY  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 05:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 146
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 76.2
50% 67.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 54.6
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 48GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 18 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 76.3
Write 58.7
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 18.7
12% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 10.3
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 17%
Richdisk device 499GB
159GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 18 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 88.5
Write 59
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 18.7
13% 59 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 10.6
32% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 11.4
8% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Richdisk device 628GB
307GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 18 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 90
Write 59
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 18.7
13% 60 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 10.7
32% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 11.6
9% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 4G1600GM 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAHOBAY Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel MAHOBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback