Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Memory 20.3 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 64 22% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 48.6 8-Core 66.3 7% 57.5 Pts	64-Core 85.2 5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39F9) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.6.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.38 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-GEN02SM19EG120GB 120GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0724A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 82 36 58 59 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 297 Write 250 Mixed 200 SusWrite 83.2 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 5.8 40% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 29.7 44% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 89%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 53GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 94 92 91 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 319 13% 319 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	52x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	14x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	8x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16