MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170321
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 10:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$87
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 229
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 434
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.3% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 69.4
63% 75 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 97
73% 87.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 1TB
35GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 20 16 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 66.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 17.8
9% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 9.3
31% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 8.7
7% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
CGM Virtual Disk 36630 1TB
759GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 80.3
Write 34
Mixed 55
SusWrite 17.8
10% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 9.8
32% 9.67 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 12.2
9% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 54GB
23GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 17.9
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 7.4
1,106% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 34%
CGM Virtual Disk 35862 537GB
3GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Poor
Read 47.6
Write 26.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 18.3
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 7.2
1,175% 6.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 2,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback