Asus Q501LA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Q501LA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q501LA
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 08:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 80.6
46% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 116
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 12BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.56
3% 4.62 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.78
4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 355 303 298 290 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 447
Write 436
Mixed 323
SusWrite 325
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 36.4
118% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 319
232% 303 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 134%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 750GB
698GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 85.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 87.8
98% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1315 BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q501LA Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q501LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback