Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 907 90% 732 Pts	64-Core 1,609 100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 152 Parallax 128 110% 139 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 139 Splatting 115 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 472 474 469 474 478 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 481 Mixed 398 SusWrite 474 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 53.1 176% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 347 262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 187 184 191 185 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 807GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 175 174 176 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 168 Mixed 89 SusWrite 175 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 419GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 114 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 150 Write 133 Mixed 82 SusWrite 113 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 109%
I-O DATA HDCL-UT 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free, PID 014a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 136 143 143 145 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 102 Write 123 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 142 162% 115 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 199% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 62%
Logitec LHR USB Device 6TB 5.5TB free, PID 0225 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 150 150 152 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.2% Good	Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 151 181% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s

BUFFALO BSCR20TU3 -SD 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 14GB free, PID 0278 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 53 52 54 54 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	Read 91 Write 52.2 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 52.8 76% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 5.5 343% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.3% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 20.7 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,481x
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,414x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,821x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,222x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,182x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	928x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,042x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	799x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	636x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	504x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	493x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	439x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16