Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 777
80% 644 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 119
Parallax 99.3
90% 110 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 468 425 323 249 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 466
Mixed 366
SusWrite 351
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.8
179% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 176
152% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
19GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 461
Mixed 395
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.2
186% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 285
224% 308 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905625-030.A00G 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 23.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback