MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 21:32
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 766
82% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 165
Parallax 162
146% 169 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 147
Splatting 107
115% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 388 389 390 392 393 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,591
Write 2296
Mixed 1,602
SusWrite 540
392% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 89.6
300% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 948
691% 904 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 269%
Great: 302%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
884GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1372 1369 1374 1372 1371 1360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,452
Write 1,358
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 1,370
294% 1304 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 76.3
257% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 272
330% 572 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 254%
Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 193 195 194 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 130
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 193
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 4266 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 26.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback