Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 194
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 601
57% 471 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 1.69
14% 13.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 14
Splatting 23.5
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 27 61 66 60 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 444
Write 372
Mixed 236
SusWrite 90.2
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 18.8
70% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 44.7
49% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
20GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 186
Mixed 250
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 43.9
153% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 192
154% 216 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
8.07% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 8.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.3
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 8%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 120GB
19GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 113 111 110 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 146
Mixed 161
SusWrite 107
202% 157 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 20.4
1,617% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 25.2
2,201% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 31.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 27.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback