Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151020
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 12:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 282
36% 275 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 55.1
38% 49.6 fps
MRender 47.8
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 33.9
34% 42 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 237 282 351 368 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 442
Mixed 372
SusWrite 300
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.8
191% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
141GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 181 182 180 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 173
Mixed 77
SusWrite 180
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 9905678-042.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback