Asus GL552VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VX
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 155
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 472
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1060) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3136
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 15.3
7% 12.4 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 13
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 80 43 88 90 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 447
Write 404
Mixed 323
SusWrite 84.6
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 27.4
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 169
170% 276 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 87%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
860GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 98 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 110
Mixed 39
SusWrite 99.9
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Kingston 9905630-007.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VX Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback