Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 469
62% 468 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 47.1
31% 37.4 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 35
Splatting 33.8
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S960G 960GB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X36310DC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 250 239 243 264 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 349
Write 393
Mixed 247
SusWrite 254
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 30.4
147% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 101
119% 206 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
350GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 152 152 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 166
Mixed 86
SusWrite 150
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GMW.BAC0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback