Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 06:52
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 288
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,192
106% 898 Pts
64-Core 1,158
72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 176
Parallax 191
146% 182 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 154
Splatting 111
121% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
6TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 216 199 216 212 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 209
Mixed 64
SusWrite 211
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback