Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 01:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 312
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.41
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 103 96 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 358
Write 67.2
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 102
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 17.3
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 56.3
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
33GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 66 64 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 93.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 64.4
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH200UD12808-1333 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 6GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback