Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141016
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 87 2-Core 178 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 621 60% 495 Pts	64-Core 794 49% 794 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 169 Parallax 181 128% 169 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 178 Splatting 0.09 71% 98.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 215 213 188 111 25 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 453 Write 398 Mixed 302 SusWrite 178 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 31.1 124% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 250 209% 302 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 101%
Transcend SSD370 64GB-$39 408 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 56GB free Firmware: N1114B SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 402 Write 75.2 Mixed 122 SusWrite 75 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 25.8 101% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 87.8 72% 105 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 66%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 498GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 505 508 507 506 507 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GB 1,302 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66.5% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 22.1 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,242x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	327x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	144x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	175x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $748

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16