Acer Aspire E1-572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-572  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HW
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '16 at 23:20
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 46.9
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 41
25% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 60.6
8-Core 60.4
8% 60.5 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46% Average
Read 85.7
Write 74.6
Mixed 88
63% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR TMT325S6EFR8A-PBHJ 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-572 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback