Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 08 '19 at 10:17
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 747
77% 620 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB; asus
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.5% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 12.4
24% 20.4 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 29.8
19% 22.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 474 480 473 431 277 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 460
Mixed 444
SusWrite 413
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.3
218% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Maxtor STM3320613AS 320GB
243GB free
Firmware: MC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 118 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 116
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 66%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
216GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 92 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 82.8
Write 90
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 89.7
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
183GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 97 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 59
SusWrite 93.7
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
615GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 125 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 122
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $812
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback