Asus Q502LAB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus Q502LAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q502LAB
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 20:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 139
57% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 204
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 199D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 6.66
4% 6.16 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 480GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 230 110 127 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 441
Write 373
Mixed 347
SusWrite 162
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 32.8
117% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 102
125% 219 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 104%
M-factors 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 191 71 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 448
Write 378
Mixed 326
SusWrite 144
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 27.3
118% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 193
169% 249 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 16
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q502LAB Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q502LAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback