PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120309 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '19 at 18:08 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
Gigabyte(1458 34DC) 1.8GB
Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 341.44
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 62 67 59 50 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,502x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 780x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 691x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 497x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 307x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |