HP 500-000a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-000a  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 07:33
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 515
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.78
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.82 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 161 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 157
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-000a Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-000a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback