Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 81 2-Core 159 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 314 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36B9) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 43.1 Parallax 38.3 36% 41.8 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 33.7 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 79 90 83 88 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 172 Write 114 Mixed 140 SusWrite 85.1 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 20.9 83% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 34.4 33% 50 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 73%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60 5,100 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 582GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 101 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 98.8 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 99.7 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99P5471-011.A00LF 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	20x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	13x
9905471-006.A01LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 332 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77