Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 157 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 418 47% 367 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 2.91 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8.09 5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 98 102 105 102 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 425 Write 209 Mixed 333 SusWrite 145 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 27.6 99% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 195 168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	478x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	86x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	35x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	144x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	70x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	42x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16