ECS H77H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H77H2-EM  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 188
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 518
50% 413 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Device(1B0A 90C0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 2.06
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 169 183 188 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 178
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 182
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-60Z0A0 320GB
80GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 34.7
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 36.1
44% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback