Asrock H270 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock H270 Performance  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 14:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600-$230
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
79% 166 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 423
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 400
27% 400 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 66.2
14% 56.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 46.8
14% 44.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 303 301 300 298 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 438
Mixed 415
SusWrite 304
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 52.3
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 65.2
131% 264 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 127%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$56
281GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 76.7
Write 71.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 77.3
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST2000DX001 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CV13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 179 186 182 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 175
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 183
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$66
821GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 108
Write 80.3
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 113
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
227GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 62.5
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H270 Performance Builds (Compare 636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback