Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 23:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 126
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 401
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13.2
10% 13 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 15.6
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 187
Mixed 208
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 11.9
74% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 28.5
46% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
Adata SP 600 32GB
23GB free
Firmware: 2.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 160
Write 36
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 35.2
16% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 18.2
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 28.1
28% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST380819AS 80GB-$89
28GB free
Firmware: 8.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 45 46 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 54.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 45.5
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LLA Series 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback