PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180418 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '19 at 09:21 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 Nano-$450
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B5273CH0- M393B5273CH0- M393B5173QH0- M393B5273CH0- 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
91.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 109x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 49x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 44x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 36x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $130 |