Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 09:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 693
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Nano-$450
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 98.4
56% 74.3 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 72.1
56% 68 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 227 216 224 223 222 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 797
Write 873
Mixed 792
SusWrite 282
154% 686 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 33.8
113% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 37
124% 266 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 151%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: G009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 150 152 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 155
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 150
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5273CH0- M393B5273CH0- M393B5173QH0- M393B5273CH0- 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 32.4
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback