| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GE75 Raider 8SF |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-17E2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181212 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 29 '19 at 07:22 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.6%
Good
|
75% 142 Pts
|
46% 282 Pts
|
9% 153 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1749
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
48% 73.4 fps
|
47% 54.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
37.8%
Below average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
30% 132 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,550 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 1,075x |
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 457x |
| Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 651x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples | 333x |
| RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples | 230x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |