Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 338 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: JF100-20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 56 50 48 20 22 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 70.8 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 42.9 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 215GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 112 112 113 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 120 Write 105 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 112 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	180x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	114x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	108x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 47%, 1,368 samples	54x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	52x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	41x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16