Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 11 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 110
53% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 179
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
AMD(1002 0000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 5.72
5% 6.23 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 128 137 62 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 38
Write 65.5
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 101
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 113%
General UDisk 128GB
87GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 9.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 16.1
20% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 0.4
365% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
453% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT12864BA1339.M8FG Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 11GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback