Jumper EZbook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemJumper EZbook  (all builds)
MotherboardWB J3160
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 09:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 45
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 44.7
25% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 87.8
12% 88 Pts
64-Core 87.8
5% 87.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 2.72
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shekinah SSD256G 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 126 127 104 125 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 274
Write 130
Mixed 128
SusWrite 119
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 8.4
48% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 92.3
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 54.4
57% 93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 6.3 11 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 49.6
Write 9.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 8.7
24% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.1
205% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EZbook Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Jumper EZbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback