Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 00:08
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 137
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 428
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 42.5
36% 39.2 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 37
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 212 26 31 32 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 333
Write 130
Mixed 248
SusWrite 99.1
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 27.4
97% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 122
117% 182 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 91 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 148
Write 101
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 89
66% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
276% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
281GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 83 92 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 98
Write 95.7
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 92.5
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
WDC WD16 00AAJB-00J3A0 160GB
149GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 33
Write 31
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 34.3
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 7.5 9.8 14 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 72.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 10.1
32% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan-2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback