Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 16:59
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 180 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 278 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% PowerColor(148C 2373) CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 50.7 Reflection 64.3 Parallax 0.09 41% 38.4 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 53.2 46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-GEN03AS18EU120GB 120GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 11 102 47 39 5.2 MB/s Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.3% Above average	Read 233 Write 112 Mixed 213 SusWrite 76.5 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 23.6 110% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 138 133% 203 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 231GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 49 56 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 74.8 Write 73 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 55 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JM2400HLH-4G Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 22.3 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	23x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	7x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	5x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GBPNYBench 82%, 961 samples	3x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,943 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16