Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181218
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '19 at 12:31
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 163 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 245 33% 244 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% PowerColor(148C 2373) CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.4% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 34.7 20% 32 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 31.5 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-GEN03AS18EU120GB 120GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 63 55 55 23 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 365 Write 99.8 Mixed 83 SusWrite 54.8 33% 151 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 10.8 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 27 DQ Mixed 25 19% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 375GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 17 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Read 7.2 Write 31.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 17.6 14% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JM2400HLH-4G Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 27.3 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 21.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	23x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	7x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	5x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GBPNYBench 82%, 961 samples	3x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,943 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16