ADD TO PC
BUILD

Eurocom X7C

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Eurocom X7C (all builds)
Motherboard	Eurocom X7C
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 273 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 536 8-Core 855 85% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,092 68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 5,557 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 115 Parallax 110 89% 112 fps	MRender 161 Gravity 102 Splatting 95.3 95% 119 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 610 623 624 616 622 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,308 Write 1,607 Mixed 566 SusWrite 644 231% 1,031 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 51 192% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 707 604% 888 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 388GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 193 180 125 104 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 490 Write 448 Mixed 340 SusWrite 191 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 9.8 90% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 174 139% 199 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 92%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 124 117 124 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 97 Write 104 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 122 69% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.2 228% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CM4X8GF2400C16S4 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CM4X8GF2400C16S4 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 25.8 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 33.6 SC Mixed 25.5 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback