Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61365

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion ERAZER P6705 MD61365  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION N857EX1M
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 20:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 618
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 36.1
35% 36.8 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 329 334 329 328 327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 1,302
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 342
273% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 67.5
220% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 745
562% 751 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 211%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
555GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 110 113 113 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 45
Write 43
Mixed 48
SusWrite 113
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
166% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion 120GB
111GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 98 87 100 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 126
Mixed 152
SusWrite 95.7
179% 137 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 18.4
1,539% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 22.1
1,816% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 127%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER P6705 MD61365 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61365

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback