Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFoxconn Flaming Blade GTI  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn Flaming Blade GTI
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 12:23
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 605
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1413 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 58.2
48% 61.6 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 53.5
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct120bx5 0 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 122 104 41 45 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 367
Write 179
Mixed 231
SusWrite 73.4
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 25.8
106% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 43.7
52% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 79%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
54GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 78 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 343
Write 81.8
Mixed 130
SusWrite 79.9
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 31.6
112% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 84.6
66% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
NE-256 256GB
177GB free
Firmware: R0607A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 65 89 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 216
Write 956
Mixed 326
SusWrite 142
94% 410 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 23.2
96% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 40.2
146% 309 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 234%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
295GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 83.3
Write 68.9
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 73.3
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
787GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 82 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 98.6
Mixed 62
SusWrite 84.1
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 21.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Flaming Blade GTI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback