HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22C5
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 53.8
35% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 85.7
8-Core 90.5
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 94.2
6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
HP(103C 22C5) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.56
5% 6 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 6.65
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 79 72 82 77 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 89
Write 77.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 76.1
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 58%
BUFFALO HD-PXTU2 1TB
398GB free, PID 01a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 18.9
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 30.3
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback