Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 21:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 565
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 71.3
46% 62.2 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 53.1
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 326
Mixed 289
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 20.4
91% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 3.2
42% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 73 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 74.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 70.3
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
174% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29.4
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback